Before
giving a detailed explanation on the decision of the IHF Council dated 14
January 2018 following the IHF Congress authorisation dated 11 November 2017,
the IHF considers the development of the sport in the continent as priority,
due to the fact that handball activities in Pan-America have been halted for
many years and are limited to three National Federations coming from the
southern part of the continent, namely Brazil, Argentina and Chile. The IHF investigated
the handball development motion from a sports, administrative, financial and,
most importantly, legal point of view. The IHF is not against a person or
entity when taking any decision, as development of handball is the main target.
If you
look back and compare the attractiveness, development and promotion of handball
before 2000 with today’s situation, it is obvious to every stakeholder that the
rapid development of the sport is remarkable. The financial situation of the
IHF also witnessed a significant increase from CHF 12 million every four years
(TV and marketing rights) to CHF 100 million (only for TV rights). The IHF
cannot hold back handball progress because of any self-interested people or
entity. The planned projects shall be realised and the decisions of the IHF
governing bodies shall be carried out, as the IHF Council is taking decisions
only after thorough study, evaluation and analysis of the planned projects by
the technical handball experts and the involvement of the IHF technical commissions
COC (Commission of Organising and Competition), PRC (Playing Rules and Referees
Commission) and CCM (Commission of Coaching and Methods). The IHF shall invest
heavily in the new system, due to the fact that currently no financial
resources exist in Pan-America until the sport will flourish and consequently
generate income. The handball progress in Pan-America is totally behind the handball
progress in the other continents, and PATHF is the only Continental
Confederation apart from the newly formed continent of Oceania, which has not
had any sponsorship or TV rights partner since 2012.
The IHF
President’s development plan includes many projects which shall promote the
development of the sport worldwide and in Pan-America. He undertakes large
endeavours in many fields to develop handball not only to maintain its position
on the Olympic programme but also to pave the way for development on all
levels, including World Championships and Olympic Games.
The IHF
is hereby asking the few people who opposed the decision to give a clear and
realistic reason for their position. “The development of handball in the
continent had been halted even before my term of office”, said the IHF
President. He added that the IHF has invested close to CHF 3.5 million into
different projects and support for the continent, but without any significant
return. The main three teams from the southern continent are moving up and down
on the international level, but the rest of the National Federations of the
continent have not been considered by the current PATHF.
The
division of the continent will not affect the continental representation in the
IHF Council, as there will be a representative from each continent in the IHF
Council instead of having two representatives from one continent. The IHF could
not wait until the legal body decided on PATHF’s appeal, as in case the appeal
is rejected, PATHF still has different instances to appeal to.
Justifications:
The justifications of the motion were divided into
the three pillars of administration, finances and competitions, taking into
consideration that the key intention of
the motion is to develop handball throughout the Pan-American continent and
preserve the position of handball at the Olympic Games.
1. Administration
a. The sports, administrative and financial attention given to all PATHF
affiliated federations was not equal,
b. The PATHF paid special attention to further develop handball in the
top nations (ARG, BRA, CHI, PAR, URU),
c. The vast distances between the two continents are not adequate for
optimal contacts and meetings require huge financial investments,
d. The current PATHF management recognises only 26 out of 40 National
Federations recognised by the IHF (http://panamhandball.org/pathf/phf/miembros-phf-members/), which is considered to be unfair for the rest of
the NFs from many perspectives, such as the chance to qualify for IHF events
and distribution of any financial contribution to any handball activities,
e. The lack of English speaking staff members at the PATHF made previous
communication with the IHF as well as the English-speaking countries difficult (for
example, one of the Pan-American National Federations commented as follows:
“The split enables us in the English speaking countries to be able to better
communicate and plan our projections in a more unified way.”),
f. Involvement of inexperienced staff members created problems among the
NFs as well as the IHF (example: the invitation to the recent PATHF
Extraordinary Congress was not communicated to the IHF according to the IHF
Statutes; as a result the meeting and the corresponding decisions are not
valid, and consequently the money (from the allocated IHF sponsorship) invested
to organise the meeting is lost).
2. Finances
a. The PATHF has no source of income except the membership fees of the
26 NFs as well as a small amount arising from registration at events.
b. The current management did not bring any sponsorship. The only source
of income is the sponsorship amounting to USD 1 million the IHF helped PATHF to
acquire.
3. Competitions
Benefits
of the new system:
a. An increase in the handball activity in
all areas.
b. Providing the opportunity to focus on
the Caribbean zone with tailor-made projects for Beach Handball. This would
give these countries a realistic chance to take part in IHF events, as they
would then belong to the North, avoiding the traditionally strong Beach
Handball nations from the South.
c. Due to the shorter travel distances,
more tournaments can be staged on a regular basis in all categories and even on
club level resulting in increased handball activity on continental level. The
IHF can hereby provide support in several matters and provide assistance in the
kick-off phase.
d. Increased motivation from teams from
North and South which usually do not participate in qualification and do not
qualify for IHF events. With earning a qualification to IHF events and with the
experience gained at international events, these teams will have the chance to
close the gap to the dominant teams and also the currently dominant teams will
benefit from stronger opponents.
e. Smaller qualification tournaments,
group stages similar to football or handball in Europe would be possible in a
second step; finishing the qualifications for IHF events earlier would be
beneficial for the planning on a long-term basis and for setting up the IHF
calendar of events.
f. With realistic chances of success on
competitive level, also the chances for raising funds from different sources
(sponsors, NOC, governmental institutions) increase significantly.
g. Through having more handball activity
on continental level, more human resources such as coaches, referees,
delegates, handball managers, etc. could be identified and promoted/educated
accordingly.
h. Giving the
IHF the possibility to further develop the IHF Trophy tournament in order to
include this tournament in the qualification pathway for Junior and Youth World
Championships. With the new proposal at least 25 national teams will play
qualification matches for the IHF Men’s Junior World Championship, whereas only
7 teams played in the last qualification under PATHF guidance. The experience
gained from the Emerging Nations Tournament in Europe proves the benefit of
this strategy (increased number of participating teams from 35 to 48).
Decisions:
The 2017 Ordinary IHF Congress held in Antalya,
Turkey, on 11 November 2017 decided by a two-third majority (102 votes in favour,
26 votes against, 24 abstentions) to delegate its authority to the IHF Council
to discuss, evaluate and take a decision on the motion regarding the IHF
Statutes related to the Pan-American continent and consequently on the relevant
IHF Statutes changes.
Following the IHF Council
decision made in its meeting in Tbilisi, Georgia on 18 August 2017, approving
the motion related to the Pan-American continent with four abstentions and
without any vote against, the Pan-American Team Handball Federation organised
an Extraordinary Congress in Bogota City, Colombia on 7 October 2017. PATHF’s
failure to invite the IHF President or at least a representative to their
Congress is a violation of Article 10.2, point 3.1 of the IHF Statutes. According
to the IHF Council decision made in its meeting in Antalya, Turkey on 9
November 2017, the case of PATHF’s violation of the Statutes was submitted to
the IHF Arbitration Commission in order to obtain their recommendation for
further treatment by the Executive Committee and the Council of the IHF as per
Article 10.2, point 3.1 of the IHF Statutes.
The recommendation of the
IHF Arbitration Commission was presented to the IHF Council in its meeting in
Zagreb, Croatia on 14 January 2018. Due to PATHF’s violation of Article 10.2,
point 3.1 of the IHF Statutes and following the recommendation of the IHF
Arbitration Commission, the Council decided, with one vote against, to suspend
the Pan-American Team Handball Federation (PATHF) according to Article 10.2,
point 3.2 of the IHF Statutes. Consequently and according to Articles 2.3 and
18.1.1 of the IHF Statutes, the IHF shall organise the World Championships’ and
Olympic Games’ qualification events.
As stipulated in Article
10.2, point 3.2 of the IHF Statutes, the suspension of the Pan-American Team
Handball Federation entails no direct consequence for the National Federations
of Pan-America.
According to the decision of the 2017 Ordinary IHF
Congress taken by a two-third majority to delegate its authority to the IHF
Council to discuss, evaluate and take a decision on the motion regarding the
IHF Statutes related to the Pan-American continent and consequently on the
relevant IHF Statutes changes, the motion concerned was on the agenda of the
IHF Council meeting in Zagreb, Croatia on 14 January 2018. With
one vote against, the Council decided to divide the continent of Pan-America
into two as follows:
• North America and
the Caribbean Handball Confederation (“North”):
Full members: ANT, BAH, BAR, CAN, CAY, CUB, DMA, DOM, GRL, GRN, HAI, IVB,
JAM, LCA, MEX, PUR, SKN, TRI, USA – total of 19 countries plus two
regional members: GLP, MTQ
• South and Central
America Handball Confederation (“South”):
Full members: ARG, BIZ, BOL, BRA, CHI, COL, CRC, ECU, ESA, GUA, GUY, HON,
NCA, PAN, PAR, PER, URU, VEN – total of 18 countries plus one regional
member: GUF